Cutting-Edge Natural Health & Anti-Aging Products.
Order by Phone: 1-866-285-1998

Tuesday, February 07, 2012

Cutting-Edge Natural Health & Anti-Aging Products.


Health Library

SupplementSpot.com has compiled thousands of scientific and medical studies to prove we have the scientific and medical facts establishing the accuracy of our product claims. We have a serious mission and hyping unproven claims is a disservice to our industry. We beseech you NOT to make a health critical decision based upon testimonials. If a health product is beneficial, there is always published and critiqued scientific and medical evidence to substantiate the claims. We have it. Few do.

Before paying large amounts of money for unproven products, please read what qualified researchers have to say about it. Feel free to download and use them as you wish. Just give us the credit.

We have thousands of citations on this site. Many have direct links to the journal articles cited. Those that do not can be found on the following medical and scientific data bases. Access to these data bases is free but require that you register as a user. Once you have registered, you will find the studies cited on this site. You can access these online libraries without cost.

Resveratrol Helps The Heart Says New University Study

Resveratrol Keeps Hearts Young

June 4, 2008

Resveratrol, A natural compound found in red wine, may protect the heart against the effects of the aging process, researchers said on Tuesday.

In their study, mice were given a diet supplemented with the compound known as resveratrol starting at their equivalent of middle age until old age. These mice experienced changes in their gene activity related to aging in a way very similar to mice that were placed on a so-called calorie restriction diet that slows the aging process by greatly cutting dietary energy intake. Most striking was how the resveratrol, like calorie restriction, blocked the decline in heart function typically associated with aging, according to Tomas Prolla, a University of Wisconsin professor of genetics who helped lead the study. Much as Spaniard Juan Ponce de Leon once searched for the mythical fountain of youth, researchers now are seeking ways to extend the quality and length of human life. In some studies, animals given a diet with greatly reduced caloric intake have lived longer than animals with normal diets. But perpetual hunger is a steep price to pay for greater longevity, some researchers say. Resveratrol, found in abundance in grapes and in red wine, has drawn a lot of interest from scientists and some companies, including GlaxoSmithKline, which in April said it would pay $720 million to buy Sirtris Pharmaceuticals Inc, a company that is developing drugs that mimic the effects of resveratrol. Some studies have shown that in high doses, resveratrol extended the life span of fruit flies and worms and prevented early death in mice fed a high-fat diet. In this study, mice were given relatively low doses compared to the earlier research, and still experienced important aging-related benefits, the researchers said. The researchers began giving the resveratrol diet to the mice when they were 14 months old — their middle age — and followed the animals until they were about 30 months old. The researchers then conducted tests on cardiac function and on gene activity related to aging. “”Resveratrol at low doses can retard some aspects of the aging process, including heart aging, and it may do so by mimicking some of the effects of caloric restriction, which is known to retard aging in several tissues and extend life span,”" added Prolla, whose study was published in the scientific journal PLoS ONE. Using a method that permits simultaneous analysis of thousands of genes at the same time, the researchers found a huge overlap in the genes whose activity were changed by resveratrol and caloric restriction. They looked at the heart, brain and muscles, and said that the effect of resveratrol was strongest in the heart but did prevent some aging-related changes in the other tissues. Just because mice had these benefits does not mean people also would, although Prolla said, “”I think there’s a high likelihood that our findings are applicable to humans.”" He said he expected to see a lot of studies in the coming years on the effects of resveratrol supplementation in people.

Soup Diet Makes Weight Loss Easy

(HealthScoutNews) — Dieting? Here’s a tip from the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition — have a bowl of soup.

That advice comes by way of a study from the nutrition department at Pennsylvania State University. Researchers already knew that watered-down foods with a “”low caloric density”" could fill you up just as well as foods that had more calories in every spoonful.

But what if the food and water were consumed separately? To test the notion, one group of people ate a bowl of soup, and another group ate a casserole made with the same ingredients as the soup, then drank a glass of water.

The results: people who ate the soup were full after 1,209 calories. The people who had the casserole with the water on the side kept going until they had reached 1,657 calories.

PSA Test

PSA Test a Thing of the Past? MONDAY, May 10 (HealthDayNews) — The PSA test, long the gold standard for deciding who should have a biopsy for prostate cancer, may have outlived its usefulness for the most part.

Stanford University researchers say PSA (prostate specific antigen) levels bear little relationship to the severity of a cancer these days. They presented their finding May 9 at the American Urology Association’s annual meeting in San Francisco.

“”We need to recognize that PSA is no longer a marker for prostate cancer,”" said study author Dr. Thomas A. Stamey, a professor of urology at Stanford University School of Medicine. “”We urgently need to find a new marker for prostate cancer, and that marker must be proportional to how much cancer you have.”"

“”We have been so thorough and effective in screening for prostate cancer over this 20-year period that PSA no longer has a relationship to prostate cancer,”" Stamey said. “”Because we all develop the cancer, we’re now removing prostates from men whose cancer is so small that they do not need the procedure. We’re finding all these little cancers that are never going to be a danger to the patient.”"

“”In smaller cancers, the PSA test is not relevant anymore,”" Stamey explained. “”You might as well biopsy a man because he has blue eyes.”"

PSA is a protein produced by the cells of the prostate gland. Because blood levels of the antigen tend to rise as the gland enlarges, it has been used for years as a test of whether a person needs a biopsy for cancer. The test, however, is not foolproof.

“”People’s perceptions [are] that if your PSA is a certain level, you’re very likely or you do have prostate cancer, and that is incorrect,”" said Dr. Mark Soloway, chairman of the department of urology at the University of Miami School of Medicine.

“”The PSA test is a very good test. It’s not a perfect test, especially in younger men,”" added Dr. Jay Brooks, chief of hematology/oncology at the Ochsner Clinic Foundation in New Orleans.

To see how the efficacy of the PSA test might have waned, researchers in Stamey’s lab reexamined every prostate that had been removed since 1983 (1,317 of them) and compared the size of the cancer with blood PSA levels. None of the cancers had been treated with chemotherapy, radiation, or hormones before surgery.

Each cancer was rated on eight or 10 different parameters thought to indicate how aggressive the cancer was, including the size of the tumor and its grade.

Stamey then divided the samples into four five-year periods to see what had happened to the qualities of the cancers over time.

“”What we showed was that in the first five years, the cancers were related to the level of serum PSA,”" Stamey said. “”Then in the next five years, they were still bad but not as bad as the first five years. Then in the third five-year period, they were better and better. And in the last five years ending Jan. 1 of this year, the cancers were so small they had no relationship to serum PSA.”"

Twenty years ago, 80 percent of cancers were detected by digital rectal examination; only 20 percent of cancers are now detected that way, Stamey explained.

Instead, PSA levels today are driven by benign enlargement of the prostate, a condition that does not usually require surgery.

The concept that the PSA test is not foolproof is not an entirely new one. “”The point is well taken that in microscopic disease, the volume of cancer is clearly overshadowed by the volume of noncancer, so that the cancer cannot be the cause of the elevated PSA,”" said Dr. John Phillips, physician-in-charge of urologic oncology at Beth Israel Medical Center in New York City.

The question now is what can replace it. “”People are trying to find other ways of finding cancer,”" Phillips added.

As a matter of fact, University of Pittsburgh researchers who presented at the same conference reported that additional testing for a protein called early prostate cancer antigen (EPCA) might mean prostate cancer could be detected as many as five years earlier than with just the PSA test.

“”We would like a perfect test that would only find biologically significant cancers,”" Soloway said. “”Today we can’t distinguish between those with indolent cancer and those whose cancers threaten their life. We need another way. That’s going to be a difficult task.”"

In the meantime, the American Urological Association issued a statement that, for the time being, the PSA test in combination with a digital rectal exam and a full medical history is the best way to determine when a biopsy might be necessary

Whole Grains Promote Healthy Weight

 

Bakers, Food makers and nutritionists are warning about the amazing popularity of the Atkins diet have a new tool in their fight against this food fad in a new study that reveals an inverse assocation between whole grains and weight gain.

It found that while women who ate a large amount of refined grain foods were more likely to be obese, those with the greatest whole grain consumption weighed less and are less likely to gain weight.

The study, published in November’s American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (vol 78, no 5, pp 920-927), investigated the relation between intake of dietary fibre and whole- or refined-grain products with weight gain over time.

They used a prospective cohort study on more than 74,000 US female nurses, aged 38-63 years in 1984 and free of known cardiovascular disease, cancer, and diabetes at baseline. Their dietary habits were assessed in 1984, 1986, 1990, and 1994 with validated food-frequency questionnaires.

Average weight, body mass index, long-term weight changes, and the odds ratio of developing obesity (BMI of 30) according to change in dietary intake were recorded.

The researchers from the Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School found that women who consumed more whole grains consistently weighed less than women who consumed less whole grains.

Over 12 years, those with the greatest increase in intake of dietary fibre gained an average of 1.52 kg less than did those with the smallest increase in intake of dietary fibre independent of body weight at baseline and age.

Women in the highest quintile of dietary fibre intake had a 49 per cent lower risk of major weight gain than did women in the lowest quintile.

The team concludes that “”weight gain was inversely associated with the intake of high-fibre, whole-grain foods but positively related to the intake of refined-grain foods, which indicated the importance of distinguishing whole-grain products from refined-grain products to aid in weight control”".

Probiotics for Health

Probiotics for Health By S.K. Dash, Ph.D.

Many health-conscious consumers today want to know when they should take probiotics. They ask whether they should wait until they are sick. If so, they ask, which illnesses respond best to probiotics? Or should they take a preventive approach and take probiotics before they get sick? What about use of probiotics with antibiotics? Today, there is no doubt that taking probiotics is as essential as a multivitamin to your health. So my reply to such questions is that a daily supplement should always be taken to maintain healthy immune and digestive function — but the supplement amount should be increased during times of stress and illness. But let’s start at the beginning.

Probiotics — What Are They?

The concept of ingesting live microorganisms for the purpose of improving one’s intestinal health and general well being can be traced back well before the beginning of the Twentieth Century to earlier eras when most foods were nonrefrigerated and instead preserved with fermentation. But the current practice of using beneficial organisms to improve and sustain health is now referred to as probiotic supplementation. Although numerous types of bacteria (and yeasts) are currently being marketed as probiotic cultures throughout the world, the two most commonly used ones are Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium.

Probiotics — A Health Essential?

Consumers rarely consider how essential healthy bacterial populations are to their health. But the fact is that a healthy ratio of beneficial to pathogenic bacteria residing within the gastrointestinal tract is essential to good health and influences not only digestive health but also immune function, detoxification, and women’s vaginal health. Unfortunately, great numbers of people today no longer have optimally balanced ratios of beneficial to pathogenic bacteria in their body, thus allowing the “”bad guys”" to gain the upper hand. This is very dangerous and one of the reasons that digestive illnesses, as well as other types of illnesses, are becoming so prevalent. Medically prescribed antibiotic use is certainly one of the most important causes of this change in our natural flora, with travel to foreign lands a close second. But beyond these detrimental impacts on our gastrointestinal health, we face many other daunting challenges to our bacterial balance. Unless one consumes organic dairy products, for example, one is almost certainly consuming traces of antibiotics and sulfa drugs, which have a disruptive effect on bowel ecology. Our highly processed food supply has also denied our bodies the opportunity to ingest beneficial bacteria as we once did through food fermentation (widely used before refrigeration). Our water also tends to be highly chlorinated which, although important from a public health perspective, has drawbacks for individual health when it comes to adversely impacting our body’s bacterial populations. When the body’s bacterial populations are upset, many kinds of illness can result. So for daily maintenance and in times of illness it just makes sense to use a quality probiotic formula.

Prevention and Treatment of Diarrhea and Constipation: Antibiotic-associated diarrhea can be attributed in part to imbalances in intestinal microflora. Bifidobacteria have been used to successfully treat intestinal disorders and in the prevention of rotaviral diarrhea in children and adults. In fact, taking a probiotic formula with antibiotics is now considered to be standard medicine in many countries. But antibiotics and probiotics must be taken a few hours apart. Constipation is a significant problem for many people, especially the elderly. Researchers have shown that enhancing Bifidobacteria in the large intestine of constipated elderly individuals provides a significant laxative effect.

Ulcer Therapy: If you’re taking antibiotics to treat your ulcer, you should be using probiotics along with your doctor’s prescribed antibiotics. That’s the message from researchers reporting in the February 2001 issue of Digestion. Frequently, nausea, bloating, diarrhea, taste disturbances and loss of appetite are side effects from use of antibiotics to eradicate Helicobacter pylori, the bacterium thought to be the causative agent in gastric ulcers. This latest study involving 120 ulcer patients shows that persons given both antibiotics and probiotics experienced markedly reduced incidence of bloating, diarrhea and taste disturbances compared to persons given only antibiotics, and most persons given the natural remedy experienced no side effects.

Enhanced Immune Function: Most of our immune cells are produced within the gastrointestinal tract and much of our protection against orally ingested pathogens (such as salmonella) is the result of a healthy gastrointestinal environment. There is perhaps no greater protection against such food-borne pathogens than the use of probiotics to sustain this healthy environment. Recent studies show that Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria can stimulate both general immunity and also specific antibodies to certain pathogens.

Lactose Intolerance: Dairy foods are a very important part of a healthy diet, but many of us suffer from some symptoms of lactose intolerance. Studies have shown that strains of Lactobaccilli and Bifidobacteria reduce symptoms of lactose malabsorption.

Establishment of Healthy Flora: in Babies and Infants Premature infants generally take longer to establish a characteristic intestinal flora, which can render them more susceptible to certain intestinal infections. Various strains of Bifidobacterium administered to premature infants results in populations of beneficial bacteria becoming established more quickly in their intestines compared to a control group. You will also likely find that children susceptible to middle ear infections enjoy better health when they are given probiotics (DDS®-Junior Probiotic for Children).

Editor’s Note: Dr. S. K. Dash is among the world’s leading experts today in the field of probiotics. Dr. Dash is founder of America’s leading probiotic company UAS Labs.

See the full unabridged version of this article at www.freedompressonline.com.

References Armuzzi, A., et al. “”Effect of Lactobacillus GG supplementation on antibiotic-associated gastrointestinal side effects during Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy: a pilot study.”" Digestion, 2001;63:1

Brain Cell Growth Boosted By DHEA Supplements

‘Anti-aging’ hormone DHEA Found to Boost Brain Cell Growth August 24, 2004

Human neural stem cells, exposed in a lab dish to the steroid DHEA, exhibit a remarkable uptick in growth rates, suggesting that the hormone may play a role in helping the brain produce new cells, according to a new study published this week in the online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

The new work, conducted by a team of scientists at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, provides some of the first direct evidence of the biological effects of DHEA on the human nervous system, according to Clive Svendsen, the study’s senior author and an authority on brain stem cells at UW-Madison’s Waisman Center.

“What we saw was that DHEA significantly increased the division of the cells,” said Svendsen, a UW-Madison professor of anatomy and neurology. “It also increased the number of neurons produced by the stem cells, prompting increased neurogenesis of cells in culture.”

DHEA or dehydroepiandrosterone is among the most abundant naturally occurring steroids in the blood of young humans, but levels decline with age and its physiological effects are poorly understood.

A synthetic form of the hormone is sold over-the-counter as a dietary supplement in the US, thought to have anti-aging properties and to offer prevention against cancer and heart disease, Alzheimer’s and other diseases. But scientists know relatively little about the drug and its basic biological effects on humans.

“We don’t know much about DHEA, but this new work adds a piece to the puzzle,” said Svendsen, who conducted the study with colleagues Masatoshi Suzuki, Lynda S. Wright, Padma Marwah and Henry A. Lardy, all of UW-Madison. “This is the first real evidence of DHEA’s effects on human neural cells.”

Svendsen and Suzuki carried out the experiments by growing human fetal neural stem cells in culture. The cells form aggregates known as ‘neurospheres,’ which were exposed to a cocktail of DHEA and growth and inhibitory factors, and observed a 29 per cent increase in new brain cells compared to cells grown in a medium with the same factors, but without DHEA.

“We saw such a pure effect of DHEA,” Svendsen said.

“It’s the only steroid we tested that had such a direct effect on stem cell growth and new neuron formation,” according to Suzuki.

The new work is important because it provides a direct window to the controversial hormone’s effects on critical human cells. Similar studies have been conducted in mice and rats, but those models have shortcomings that are difficult to address, Svendsen notes.

“There are previous studies in rats that suggest DHEA is neuroprotective, but the problem with DHEA in rats is that it is not a major metabolite in that animal so its effects may not be the same as those seen in humans,” he said. According to Lardy, metabolic products of DHEA hormone have also been shown to aid memory retention in old mice.

Despite hints from the studies in rodents that DHEA may play a role in enhancing the brain and memory, the new findings reported in the PNAS article were a surprise, he said.

“We assumed the compounds we were testing would be more active than DHEA in brain stem cells,” Lardy explains. In previous studies, Lardy, with Wisconsin biochemistry colleagues James Ntambi and Brian Fox, showed that DHEA blocked a step in fat synthesis.

“The effects of DHEA on brain stem cells is a completely new finding,” said Lardy. “The problem of whether DHEA itself is having this effect, or if there’s another metabolite of the hormone involved, still exists.”

One of the intriguing aspects of the new work, according to Svendsen, is the possibility that DHEA could have some positive effects on the adult human brain.

It is known that DHEA amounts fall progressively during aging, and reduced levels of DHEA have been reported in both adolescents and adults with major depressive disorders. And given the fact that adult humans have neural stem cells that continue to make new neurons in some parts of the brain, there is a possibility that DHEA could play a role in moderating the genesis of new brain cells.

Fish Oil Supplements Can Be Purer Than Fish

Fish Oil Supplements Can Be Purer Than Fish

University of Southern California School of Pharmacy Detects No PCBs in Fish Oil Supplements in Health Products for Americas Top Retailers.

CARSON, Calif., Jan. 9 — As more Americans eat fish to protect themselves against heart disease and other illnesses, the scientific community debates whether toxins found in fish can do more harm than good. A recent study to be published in the journal Science found that farm raised salmon contained high levels of pollutants like PCBs and pose a health risk to humans. While the debate will continue on acceptable levels of PCB consumption in fish, consumers should understand that fish oil supplements can be purer than fish and are still safe to take.

Recognizing the serious health risks associated with PCBs found in food, Leiner Health Products asked the University of Southern California School of Pharmacy (USC) to test fish oil supplements it sells to the nation’s top retailers. Using analytical procedures approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), USC randomly analyzed fish oil supplements from 18 different lots. No PCBs, dioxins or heavy metals such as lead, cadium, mercury or arsenic were detected in any of the samples.

“We used EPA’s best method (Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector (GC-ECD) to test Leiner’s fish oil capsules for PCBs. This is a complex, confirmed method of analysis that has been used for over 30 years. Our analysis supports the American Heart Association’s findings of the health benefits from consuming fish oil in the form of dietary supplements. Our research proves that people can take fish oil supplements without risking their health due to possible environmental contaminant intake,” remarked Dr. Roger Clemens, Director of Analytical Research & Services, USC School of Pharmacy.

Additional samples of Leiner’s fish oil capsules were also independently evaluated by Covance Laboratories in Madison, Wisconsin. Those findings were consistent with the USC results.

Some people believe fish oil supplements contain higher concentrations of PCBs than fish but this is not true. In order to produce the purest possible fish oil, Leiner uses a process called molecular distillation to remove pollutants. This process is similar to a water purification process that traps virtually all contaminants, resulting in a “”clean”" oil.

Molecular distillation is an excellent way to rid fish oil of PCBs, other toxins and heavy metals such as mercury, lead, cadium and arsenic to below detectable levels. While it is impossible to remove 100% of all impurities, Leiner fish oil processed using molecular distillation exceeds purity standards set by California’s Proposition 65 requirements and the EPA requirements, which are much more rigorous than FDA.